新鲜资讯

返回新鲜资讯

GRE作文结构框架超强复习攻略，一键copy学霸复习法！

发布时间：2020-09-12

最近，总有小伙伴来咨询：就快考试了，GRE作文应该如何复习，用自己的方法备考总是很没效率。

那么，今天必考词就给大家整理了一套全面且干货满满的作文复习攻略，一起来学习一下吧。

拿到作文题，首先要有一个清晰的思路规划好文章的大致内容主干，有条理地列出作文的outline。这样，不但可以帮助归纳，充实自己的段落内容。还能帮助大家在review整篇文章的时候确定文章核心。

我们首先来回顾一下应该如何详列出GRE作文的结构框架：

GRE作文Outline Sample

- Position: Agree/Disagree/Agree with Caution

- Reason 1

- Reason 2

- Counter-argument

在写作考试开始时，可以列出以上4点，每点用1-2句概括想法。

开始写作的时候，根据Position，自然发展写作Introduction Paragraph。Reason 1和2各占一个自然段，记得添加生动有说服力的例子。

Counter-argument里需要预测相反立场的人会提出的一个原因，并用自己的例子和分析反驳。最后，Conclusion在Outline里不用包含，快速总结全文即可。

梳理完文章的整体框架，大家是不是对作文的整体结构有了更清晰明确的认识了。那么大家在总结归纳优秀作文结构的时候肯定会大量阅读一些范文。

那么，如何高效的总结出范文中的核心亮点，以及可以借鉴的逻辑呢？

大家在读范文的时候需要做的就是，把握住好文章的脉络，捋顺文章架构。阅读文章时也别忘了进行标注。

同学们可以用红笔芯标注每句话的作用，整理出文章的结构。也可以用荧光笔标注文采或其它方面出色的，可以借鉴的地方。

这里我们手把手来教大家标注一个优秀范文，大家仔细阅读哦。

优秀范文标注指南

The issue claims that judging work harshly in whichever should not be done by those who are not highly knowledgeable and studied in that particular area. [sum claim] This is a complex issue indeed. It is sometimes true that expert opinions should be valued over others. [reason for] However, at times this point could also be invalid. [reason against] In order to form a well-reasoned opinion on the matter, it is essential to analyze the questionable assumptions that this claim makes. Support in favor, as well as compelling evidence against this particular issue and examples of each, will be provided.

One example in favor of the claim is that field experts have particular knowledge likely garnered from years of experience and education. Therefore, their counsel on any topic within their ken can be considered supported. [reason for *2 sentences] One anecdote from today’s political rhetoric supports this. Climate change has been a debated topic, and many scientists researching the subject have published research with clear evidence that proves it exists. However, in the political arena, certain politicians reject the notion of climate change as a hoax and negate the evidence presented by researchers in their rhetoric. It is much more difficult for some to believe politicians who do not understand the science behind the global temperature shift. [Example * 3 sentences] Sound evidence provided by experts on climate change is much more plausible. [restate reason]

However, one example against the claim is that opinions and input from individuals outside the field can still be valid. They bring different views and interpretations that perhaps those within the field are blind to. [reason against *2sentence] For example, there are many cross-cultural differences when it comes to beliefs about illness. A doctor, an expert in curing and diagnosing illness, might not have the cultural competence to help someone from a different belief system. For that reason, a member from that community would be better apt to help understand the differences that are perhaps lost in translation.

A third example against this claim is that judgment is valuable to a specific person and his or her belief system throughout a lifetime. Solely because an expert argues that a certain lifestyle is better or healthier does not hold true for every individual. [reason against*2 sentences] In this sense, each person has the

right to choose what path to follow and what information to accept. For example, an expert nutritionist could claim that a vegetarian lifestyle is the best option because it reduces our footprint and the amount of hormones we ingest. However, those with certain illnesses, many fruit allergies, or even mothers with

finicky children would find this advice difficult to follow. [Example*3 sentences] The judgment of the individual in this case, although not an expert in the field of nutrition, is valid because they are an expert in their own lives and needs. [restate reason]

In conclusion, this is a complex issue. As the evidence presented clearly shows, there are compelling reasons for judgment of any field by an expert. It is sometimes true that experts can provide necessary information and judgment within their area of expertise. [review reason for *2 sentence] On the other hand, their opinions and knowledge may not be applicable in all instances. In drawing from both sides of the argument, it seems more valid to assume that experts are not always right. Their merit in whichever field is not law, and individuals are also free to judge whatever they say or claim. [review reason against *2 sentences] In the future, it would be more beneficial to evaluate both expert and lay opinions alike in order to properly judge an issue for its worth. In this way, a more multi-

faceted progression could be achieved and promote the growth of mankind. [restate position]

整理红色标注后，范文结构示例如下：

[Intro]

- sum claim*1 sentence

- reason for *1 sentence

- reason against *1 sentence

- Anything *1 sentence

[2nd Paragraph]

- reason for *2 sentences

- example *3 sentences

- restate reason *1 sentence

[3rd Paragraph]